Lynskey Performance Bike Review (Not good...)

7/7 Update: Received a response from Lynskey with another estimated ship date of 7/23 (two months past the original date) and well past the "worst case scenario" date of 7/3 through 7/8. Still feel like they need to cover shipping for my troubles.

7/7 Update 2: They were not willing to pay for shipping due to the heavily discounted price, but did offer a number of frame upgrades which is acceptable.  Now we wait...

I ordered a Lynskey Atlas Complete on Mar 31, 2025 and shortly thereafter received an email with an intended ship date of May 23, 2025.  At this point, all seemed to be going well...

Unfortunately, the ship date came and went without a single communication or update as to what was going on.  I did receive an email on April 15th requesting additional funds for the SRAM Eagle 90 kit which I promptly paid.  On May, 27th I sent an email asking for an update on my order and anticipated new ship date since the previous was missed.  No reply...  Sent a follow up email on May 31st again asking for an update.  No reply...  Sent yet another email on June 5th and this time attempted to CC one of the company owners.  Unfortunately, the email made it to support, but bounced trying to reach Mark Lynskey.  Finally, Deacon replied with the following on June 5th:

Apologies on the communication as I have been in the office by myself for most of the past few weeks making it tough to get back to all communication as quickly as I would prefer. I do have help coming which will be a huge benefit in communication for us. 

Based on what I am seeing from my shop foreman we are working to finish your frame through production over the next couple of weeks due to some delays in production from launching 8 new 2025 models across all disciplines that we offer. 

I am currently looking at a worse case scenario of July 3-8th for your order, due to the production delays, but also delays with SRAM on fulfillment and shipping schedules that they originally provided. We are working with them to get the parts here asap so we do not have any other hold-ups in production and getting this bike out to you. 

We want to thank you for your patience with us through these delays and we can’t wait to get this awesome new bike out to you.

I sent a reply on June 27th asking for an update, no reply...  I received an auto-response from Deacon indicating:

I will out of the office and away from email access from June 27th until July 7th

Fine, I will give Deacon the benefit of the doubt but he did indicate help was coming on his June 5th email:

I do have help coming in the office within about 2 weeks that will hopefully allow us to spread the communication load and be able to get updates out more steadily on the goings on here within the shop.

So, is that help not "helping".  This is no excuse for not providing a response especially when I laid down nearly $4K for a bike I still do not have.  Communication and customer service should be paramount for a small bike manufacturer.  A simple email indicating the original ship date was missed, this is why and this is the new ship date would have gone a long way here.  In addition, they should have an order status page showing where things are through the process along with notes from the various departments (welding, parts, assembly, shipping, etc).  In other words, I should not have to keep asking!

My email this morning indicated several things:

• Provide an update with hard ship date by close of business on Monday July 7th or I would like to start the refund process.
• If I do not have an update, I am going to file a fraud case with the Tennessee Attorney General.  Lynskey took the funds the day of the order, not when they ship the bike so something to be aware of if you decide to roll the dice.
• If they can provide a ship date by close of business tomorrow, they should pay the $249.52 shipping cost for my troubles and to make this situation right.

At this point, I am very frustrated with Lynskey and will not do business with them again.  I do hope for peaceful resolution and I really do want to give them a chance here, but its a struggle.  Stay tuned...

https://www.trustpilot.com/review/lynskeyperformance.com

I am also exploring violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act:

https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/attorneygeneral/documents/consumer/militaryguide/appendixb.pdf

C.A. § 47-18-104(b)(9): "Advertising goods or services with intent not to sell them as advertised."

• If the company took your money with no genuine intention of shipping the bike within the promised timeframe, or at all, this could apply.

T.C.A. § 47-18-104(b)(10): "Advertising goods or services with intent not to supply reasonably expectable public demand, unless the advertisement discloses a limitation of quantity.

• If the company continued to take orders (including yours) knowing they were overwhelmed or understaffed and couldn't meet the promised delivery times, this section might be relevant.

T.C.A. § 47-18-104(b)(22): "Using any advertisement containing an offer to sell goods or services when the offer is not a bona fide effort to sell the advertised goods or services. An offer is not bona fide, even though the true facts are subsequently made known to the buyer, if the first contact or interview is secured by deception.

• This is a strong candidate if the initial transaction was secured under false pretenses regarding the company's ability or intent to deliver the product as promised.

T.C.A. § 47-18-104(b)(27): "Engaging in any other act or practice which is deceptive to the consumer or to any other person; provided, however, that enforcement of this subdivision (b)(27) is vested exclusively in the office of the attorney general and reporter."

• This is a broad "catch-all" clause that allows the Attorney General's office to address deceptive practices not specifically listed, which could include a pattern of taking money and failing to deliver or communicate. While individuals can sue under other parts of the TCPA, direct enforcement of this specific subsection is reserved for the AG.

PC Engines APU1D4 with OPNsense

After many years (2015) of operation as a home firewall, my PC Engines APU1D4 croaked (so I thought).  Initially I was thinking it was the mSATA drive, so I started there.  New drive came in, plugged it in and same issue, click, click, click and no POST.  Considering the age of the board, I actually found a replacement which I quickly ordered assuming that was the next best option.  New board arrives, I quickly plug it in and click, click, click.  Moving on to the next logical piece, the power supply.  Ran over to my local electronics parts store and found a suitable power supply with proper voltage/amperage.  Plug everything in and up it goes!  It was an expensive lesson (with ultimately a cheap solution), but now I have spare parts.

After noticing pfSense had not made updates in well over a year, I moved to OPNsense.  The install and setup was flawless, no issues.  One thing I did notice was the near daily crashes (page faults) and reboots.  The APU1D4 boards have Realtek NIC's and OPNsense does not come bundled with the correct driver, so it uses the default kernel driver.  Under Plugins in the OPNsense console, you will notice a "os-realtek-re" option.  Install it and reboot.  So far its been nearly a day now without a reboot and I am assuming this addresses the issue.  

Hopefully this helps someone else in the same frustrating situation.

Update: Crashes continue even after installing the Realtek driver but less frequent.  Several posts have mentioned disabling both the Spectre and Meltdown tunables.  These are "vm.pmap.pti" = 0 and "hw.ibrs_disable" set to 1.  Being a home based firewall, I am not too concerned with either of these.  Plus, there is apparently quite a bit of overhead with both settings which should lead to faster throughput being disabled.  Firewall has been up for nearly two days now without a crash, so we will see.  Next up, updating the coreboot BIOS to v4.17.0.3.  Here is a handy little script to do so.

2021 Mileage Roundup

Not as many miles as I would have hoped, but still not terrible for 2021.

Get NetScaler HA status using PowerShell

I had the need today to pull the HA status from numerous NetScalers before doing some maintenance.  Instead of logging in to each device, this script takes advantage of the NetScaler API to pull and summarize this information.  Hope this helps someone...

if (-not $login){
    $login = @(
        @{
            name = "somedomain"
            credential = Get-Credential -Message somedomain
        },
        @{
            name = "root"
            credential = Get-Credential -Message nsroot -UserName nsroot
        }
    )
}

$clusters = @(
    @{
        nodes = @(
            "nsr1.domain.local"
            "nsr3.domain.local"
        )
        credential = "somedomain"
    },
    @{
        nodes = @(
            "nsr1-fe.domain.local.remote"
            "nsr3-fe.domain.local.remote"
        )
        credential = "root"
    }
)

$result = foreach($cluster in $clusters){

    # Build login object
    $cred = $login | Where-Object {$_.name -eq $cluster.credential}
    $auth = @{ login= @{ username = $cred.credential.UserName; password = $cred.credential.GetNetworkCredential().Password } }

    # Enumerate nodes
    foreach($node in $cluster.nodes){

        Write-Verbose ("Working on node {0} with credential {1}" -f $node, $cred.name) -Verbose

        # Get auth token from NSR
        $token = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri ("https://{0}/nitro/v1/config/login" -f $node) -Method Post -Body ($auth | ConvertTo-Json) -ContentType "application/json"

        # Build auth session cookie
        $session = New-Object Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.WebRequestSession
        $cookie = New-Object System.Net.Cookie 
        $cookie.Name = "NITRO_AUTH_TOKEN"
        $cookie.Value = $token.sessionid
        $cookie.Domain = $node
        $session.Cookies.Add($cookie)

        # Get NSR HA configuration
        $hainfo = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri ("https://{0}/nitro/v1/config/hanode" -f $node) -WebSession $session -Method Get

        # Log off session
        Invoke-RestMethod -Uri ("https://{0}/nitro/v1/config/logout" -f $node) -WebSession $session -Method Post -Body (@{logout = @{} } | ConvertTo-Json) -ContentType "application/json"

        [PSCustomObject]@{
            NodeName = $node
            NodeIP =  $hainfo.hanode.ipaddress -join ', '
            HAStatus = $hainfo.hanode.hastatus -join ', '
            State = $hainfo.hanode.state -join ', '
        }
    }
}

$result | Format-Table -AutoSize

Azure DevOps Download secure file

Ran in to an interesting issue today in regards to on-prem Azure DevOps and the "Download secure file" task. The step was throwing the message "##[error]Error: self signed certificate in certificate chain". We use self signed certificates internally and the agents are not trusting the server. In order to get around this, set the system environment variable NODE_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZED to 0, then restart each agent. Should work fine after this.

I am simply posting what worked for me, but others are seeing this as well:

https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/problem/483108/unable-to-verify-the-first-certificate.html

Check a site changes in PowerShell

I am in the process of purchasing a new backpack. As part of this process, I have been working with the MFG on a date for when their new pack is coming out. Instead of hitting the site X times a day, this simple PowerShell script monitors for changes on a specific page. There are several sites out there which do this for you, but they normally charge. Yeah, they are a bit more fancy and allow change regions, but I need to detect a simple change. So, here it is:

$checkUrl    = "https://somesite/products/packs/"
$checkMin    = 30
$origcontent = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $checkUrl -Method Get

do {
    
    $content = Invoke-WebRequest -Uri $checkUrl -Method Get

    if ($content.Content -eq $origcontent.Content){
        Write-Verbose "Page contents are the same, sleeping.." -Verbose
        Start-Sleep -Seconds ($checkMin*60)
    }else{
        Write-Host "Page difference detected, exiting!" -ForegroundColor Green
        break
    }

} while ($true)

2020 Mileage Roundup

Cleanup Windows AD delegation

Throughout the course of time, we have gone through two iterations of naming standards in regards to Hyper-V cluster node names. Since delegation is not tied to the associated computer account, the delegated server name persists within computer accounts. Meaning, when the computer account is removed, the delegation remains behind. This script will go through each, validate if the computer account actually still exists, then remove it if not. Great little way to keep things clean...

$hvObjects = Get-ADComputer -SearchBase "<ou_path>" -Filter 'Name -like "some*filter*"' -Properties msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo

foreach ($hvComputer in $hvObjects){

    Write-Verbose ('Processing computer account {0}' -f $hvComputer.Name) -Verbose

    $delegList = @()

    foreach ($deleg in ($hvComputer | Select -ExpandProperty msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo | Sort-Object)){

        $compName = (($deleg -split "/")[1] -split "\.")[0]

        if (Get-ADComputer -Filter ('Name -eq "{0}"' -f $compName) -SearchBase "<ou_path>"){
            $delegList += $deleg.ToString()
        }else{
            Write-Warning ('Computer account {0} not found, removing from delegation [{1}]' -f $compName,$deleg)            
        }

    }

    if ($delegList){
        Write-Verbose ('Setting updated delegation on computer account {0}' -f $hvComputer.Name) -Verbose
        $hvComputer| Set-ADComputer -Replace @{'msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo'= $delegList} -Verbose
    }

}

Saving personal Git snippets

I had a need this week to save all my personal Git Snippets.  Obviously, viewing and saving each Snippet would have been extremely time consuming and simply not necessary given Git has an API.  The PowerShell 7 script below will enumerate each of your Snippets and save them to the folder specified.  This will also save a file with the same name as the Snippet, but with a .info extension which includes all pertinent information about the Snippet itself. Quick and dirty, but works :-)

$git_token  = @{ "PRIVATE-TOKEN" = "<your_git_api_token" }
$git_url    = "https://git.some_domain.io/api/v4/snippets"
$snip_count = 100
$export_loc = "E:\Snippets"

# Enumerate each snippet
foreach ($snip in (Invoke-RestMethod -Uri ("{0}?per_page={1}" -f $git_url, $snip_count) -Headers $git_token)) {
    
    Write-Verbose ("Processing snippet: {0} [Id: {1}]" -f $snip.title, $snip.id) -Verbose
    
    # Determine file path based on file_name or title if file_name does not exist
    $out_file = if(!$snip.file_name){
        ("{0}.snip" -f ($snip.title.Split([IO.Path]::GetInvalidFileNameChars()) -join '_' -replace ' ', '_'))
    }else{
        $snip.file_name
    }
    
    Write-Verbose (" Out file: {0}" -f $out_file) -Verbose
    
    # Save snippet code
    Invoke-RestMethod -Uri ("{0}/{1}/raw" -f $git_url, $snip.id) -Headers $git_token -OutFile (Join-Path -Path $export_loc -ChildPath $out_file)

    # Save info file
    $snip | Out-File -FilePath (Join-Path -Path $export_loc -ChildPath ("{0}.info" -f (Split-Path -Path $out_file -LeafBase)))
}

Extracting Prometheus Metric Names from Grafana

Had the need to extract all our Prometheus metric names out of our Grafana dashboards to determine what was in use and what was not. The PowerShell script below will use the Grafana API to pull back all the dashboards within a specific folder and with a partial name, enumerate the dashboards, extract the expressions, then extract the metric name(s):

[Net.ServicePointManager]::SecurityProtocol = [Net.SecurityProtocolType]::Tls12

$boards = Invoke-WebRequest "https://[url]/api/search?query=hyper&folderIds=2308" -Method Get | Select -ExpandProperty Content | ConvertFrom-Json

foreach($board in $boards){
    
    $boardinfo = Invoke-WebRequest ("https://[url]/api/dashboards/uid/{0}" -f $board.uid) -Method Get | Select -ExpandProperty Content | ConvertFrom-Json

    $graphs  = @()
    $graphs  = ($boardinfo.dashboard.panels | Where-Object type -eq row).panels
    $graphs += ($boardinfo.dashboard.panels | Where-Object type -notmatch "row")

    $result = Select-String "(?<=\()(\w*)(?=\{)" -input $graphs.targets.expr -AllMatches | Foreach-Object {$_.matches} | Sort-Object Value | Select-Object -ExpandProperty Value -Unique

    [PSCustomObject]@{
        Title = $board.title
        Count = $result.count
        Metrics = $result        
    }

}